A tutor should be a doctoral student, researcher, or an experienced security professional with interest in new technology and scientific research. Tutoring in the seminar is an opportunity to learn more about a technology or a research area. Tutoring is also a great way to learn to know MSc students who will soon be looking for thesis positions. Moreover, doctoral students can get study credits for tutoring.
The course staff contact email address is T-110.5291@tkk.fi.
The main tasks of the tutors are to propose topics in their own areas of interest, help with finding key references, guide the writing process, and provide feedback for grading. We do our best to minimize the administrative burden on tutors. The tasks of the turors are the following:
The tutor is expected to meet each student at least once, but face-to-face meetings after each deadline are recommended and often are the easiest way to provide effective guidance.
Participation in the one-day seminar is highly recommended for tutors. The value of the seminar for the students depends on active discussion by senior participants.
Tutors should preferably propose three different topics so that students have some choice within the tutor's interest area. The descriptions are added to the topic page and the tutors are invited to presents their topics in the first course meeting. Students will select topics of interest when they sign up for the course, and the course staff will assign topics to the students.
A topic description should include
Please send your topic descriptions to course staff by email as soon as possible but at latest by the first course meeting. Note that best students often choose their topics early.
After the topic assignment, the tutor should meet the students individually. In the meeting, following should be discussed:
Tutor's responsibility is to propose a grade for the paper using the following scale:
0 | Fail | |
1 | Satisfactory | meets minimum requirements to pass the course |
2 | Very Satisfactory | shows effort but some clear flaws |
3 | Good | meets most formal requirements, may have minor flaws |
4 | Very Good | excellent in some aspects, interesting to read |
5 | Excellent | exceptional work or a clear research contribution |
Overall impression of the paper:
Does the paper look like a technical or scientific article?
Is the structure of the paper logical?
Does the content correspond to the title and the abstract?
Is the paper otherwise consistent, leading from background and sources to analysis and conclusions?
Is the text the student's own (not copied or modified from the web or other sources)?
Language and editing:
Is the language appropriate for a technical or scientific paper?
Is the paper easy to read and understand?
Has the student really read his/her own text through and revised it?
Are there major mistakes in language and grammar?
Are pictures, graphs and equations helpful to the reader?
References:
Are the references relevant, up-to-date and appropriate for the topic and for technical and scientific writing in general (Google and Wikipedia are not acceptable)?
Are there some references to high-quality research papers?
Are any essential references missing?
Are citations used correctly to prove a point or to acknowledge a source?
Is the bibliographic data correct?
Process issues:
How well has the student followed the course time-line?
Has the student listened to the feedback and revised the paper accordingly?
Has the student done the work independently or is the paper mostly written by the tutor?
Technical or scientific contribution:
How well does the paper meet the requirements that were defined at the beginning of the course?
Does the paper contain any useful information not already available from open sources in a similar format?
Is the paper interesting to the seminar audience, or to any other technical audience? Is it worth reading?
Does the work make any new technical or scientific contribution? (This is not required but best papers often present a small novel idea or point of view, or confirm and demonstrate ideas from the literature.)
Doctoral students can get study credits for tutoring seminar papers. These will be for the course code T-110.6110 Individual Studies in Datacommunications Software and will be marked as "passed". Tutors will be given credits according to the following table.
Number of students who finish the course | ECTS |
1 | 2 |
2 | 3 |
3 | 4 |