Feedback on T-110.551 - Seminar on Internetworking, autumn 2002

Please take a few minutes to fill out this form. By doing that, you help us develop the course to help future participants better grasp the essentials this course aims to teach its participants.

This form is anonymous. If you want to give personal feedback (e.g. about your the course staff or your tutor), you can contact

The form is open 30.11.-10.12.2002.

The feedback form consists of two parts. The answers to the first part are separated from the answers to the second part for anonymousity.

Thank you!

Section I

The answers to the questions in this section are stored separately from the rest.

1. Department


2. Studying year


Section II

3. How much work you needed to pass the course (hours)

4. How many credits should be given of the course, when compared with the required work load? (0-10)

5. What were the most important things you learned at this course? (E.g. your own topic, internet protocols for mobile computing in general, how to write a scientific paper, how to write in English, how to give a presentation, how to oppone, ... )

6. What were the most difficult parts of this course? (E.g. finding material, getting the "complete picture" of your topic or the general topic, using LaTeX, structuring the paper, writing the paper, giving a presentation, opponing, ... )

7. Comments about the conference in Sjökulla

8. State your opinition, how useful the course was for you?
(0 = not useful at all, 5 = very useful)


9. How interesting did you find the course? (0-5)


10. How much did you learn?


11. Give a general grade for the whole course

0   1   2   3   4   5  

12. Evaluate the following statements:

Statement I disagree strongly I disagree I neither agree nor disagree I agree I agree strongly
I got enough guidance          
I got guidance on time          
I found all instructions I needed on the course web pages          

13. I would have wanted more instructions regarding:

14. The schedule was


15. At this course, there was 2 intermediate submissions before the final submission (that is, the annotated table of contents, and the full paper). I found the number of intermediate submissions to be


16. Comments about your tutor:

17. Comments about the assistant and/or the professor:

18. Give a general grade for the whole course

0   1   2   3   4   5  

19. Free feedback: